Iran nuclear talks end with agreement to meet again in Moscow

May 24, 2012- published by WashingtonPost

BAGHDAD — Two days of talks between Iran and six world powers over Tehran’s disputed nuclear program concluded late Thursday with an agreement to meet again in Moscow next month.

There was no sign that any of the many differences over how to address world concerns about Iran’s nuclear ambitions had been bridged. But, according to European Union  foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, it was a sign of progress that Iran had agreed to attend further talks.

“It is clear that we both want to make progress and that there is some common ground,” she told reporters after more than 11 hours of talks Thursday. “However, significant differences remain.”

The next round of talks will be held in Moscow on June 17-19, she said.

The development came after Iran rejected a new package of proposals put forward by the six world powers, including the United States, at a marathon session Wednesday. U.S. officials said the extension of the talks into Thursday suggested there was still hope that the crisis over Iran’s nuclear program could be resolved through diplomacy.

The package contained what U.S. officials said were confidence-building measures that Iran would need to take to demonstrate that its nuclear program is not aimed at producing a weapon. The measures are believed to include a halt to Iran’s contentious uranium-enrichment program.

But there was no offer of immediate relief from the biting economic sanctions that are hurting Iran’s economy and, notably, no proposal to reconsider a potentially crippling prohibition on Iranian oil exports by the European Union that is to go into effect July 1, a top priority for Tehran.

Iran’s official Islamic Republic News Agency condemned the package as “outdated, not comprehensive and unbalanced.”

“There is no balance, and there is nothing to get in return,” the news agency said.

The United States and its allies have been particularly concerned about Iran’s enrichment of uranium to 20 percent — above the 5 percent concentration of “low-enriched uranium” needed to fuel reactors in nuclear power plants but well below the 85 percent or higher “weapons grade” fissile material used in atomic bombs. Iran has insisted that it needs 5 percent enriched uranium to fuel nuclear power plants and 20 percent material to power a medical research reactor in Tehran.

U.N. Security Council resolutions have called on Iran to stop enriching uranium altogether, a position that Western powers have continued to take in talks with Tehran. Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has insisted on developing an independent nuclear fuel cycle. He has also repeatedly denied that Iran wants nuclear weapons, which he has declared to be forbidden by Islam.

The chasm between the six powers and the Iranians on such core issues as sanctions and uranium enrichment deepened pessimism about the likelihood of a deal.

“The West can’t give enough on sanctions, and Iran won’t concede enough on the nuclear side — at least not yet,” said Aaron David Miller, a former senior adviser to the State Department on Middle East issues. In the meantime, he said, the talks are being kept alive as a “management exercise driven by Iran’s vulnerability and need for sanctions relief and the West’s fear of war.”

But others drew hope from the fact that the two sides saw reasons to continue talking.

“An initial confidence-building deal is still within reach if both sides show some flexibility,” said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association, a Washington nonprofit.” While an agreement on initial confidence-building steps was not reached in Baghdad, it is clear that both sides are exchanging serious proposals that could produce results in the next round.”

Talks continued until nearly midnight Wednesday at a guesthouse in Baghdad’s fortified Green Zone between chief Iranian negotiator Saeed Jalili and representatives of the six world powers: the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany. The negotiations were originally scheduled to last one day, but the parties ultimately agreed to extend them into Thursday in hopes of keeping the diplomatic effort alive.

With Israel threatening to strike Iranian nuclear facilities to prevent the Islamic Republic from developing the capacity to build a nuclear bomb, many military and security experts portrayed the latest talks, which began in Istanbul last month after a 15-month hiatus, as a last chance to avert war.

“It has been a difficult day, but I take that as a good sign,” a senior U.S. administration official said Wednesday, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject. “It means we have engaged with each other and discussed difficult issues.”

The proposals presented to Iran were intended to ease Western concerns about the country’s nuclear ambitions while offering Tehran a path toward eventual relief from Western sanctions. The six world powers, known as the P5-plus-1, are pressing Iran to immediately give up some of the most weapons-sensitive parts of its nuclear program, including its production of enriched uranium. Iran also is being asked to ship abroad its existing stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium and eventually shut down a new enrichment plant built into a mountainside near the city of Qom. Much of Iran’s 20 percent enriched uranium is being made there, inside bunkers beyond the reach of most conventional airstrikes.

If Iran agreed, it would receive modest relief from some technology restrictions, such as on imports of aircraft parts, Western diplomats said. Broader relief from sanctions and oil embargoes would come later as part of a more comprehensive agreement on permanent limits to Iran’s nuclear program, the officials said.

Iran countered the proposal with a five-point package, which included broadening the focus of the talks to incorporate the escalating conflict in Syria, which is emerging as a battleground for influence between the United States and its regional allies and Tehran, which is closely aligned to the regime in Damascus.

U.S. officials said they rejected the inclusion of any issue other than Iran’s nuclear program in this round of talks.

Hopes had been raised that the negotiations might produce a breakthrough after the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog announced Tuesday that it was close to a deal with Iran that would open up some of its most secretive nuclear facilities to inspection.

But U.S. officials stressed that the tentative accord reached with the International Atomic Energy Agency pertained to the processes by which Iran might account for the nuclear research programs it has conducted in the past and would not address its plans into the future.

The apparent deal with the IAEA attempts to resolve one of the thorniest disputes between Iran and Western governments in recent years: the nation’s refusal to account for a secret program of alleged nuclear weapons research conducted as recently as 2003. Iran insists that it has never sought to manufacture nuclear weapons, but it has routinely blocked access to key scientists and to military installations where the work was alleged to have occurred.

After a previously unscheduled visit to Iran over the weekend, IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano said Tuesday that the two sides had essentially settled their differences and were formalizing a plan that would ease the investigation of Iran’s past nuclear activities, ending a six-year stalemate.

IACNT on Social Networks

PayPal Donation

Currency:
Amount: