Iran Sanctions Fight: Three myths no lawmaker should believe
By Alireza Jafarzadeh- Posted on FoxNews on Jan 21, 2015
The expected congressional vote on a new sanctions bill against the Iranian regime has rekindled debate over Tehran's nuclear defiance and the best way to confront it. Congress has misgivings about a rogue regime intent on obtaining nuclear capability, and understandably wants to ensure that Washington does not strike a bad deal.
Some argue that a decisive approach toward Tehran will be counterproductive. But their position ignores historical lessons and stands on a number of myths that need to be debunked.
Myth #1: More sanctions on Iran will prompt the regime to unilaterally walk away from the talks.
In Solidarity with Charlie Hebdo
Published by IranFocus on Jan 9, 2015
This was bound to happen and no one was surprised by it. . The savage religious war being waged in Iraq and Syria now affects the entire world, and nobody’s freedom of speech and right to life is owed any respect by Islamist extremists. Masked gunmen stormed the Paris offices of the satirical newspaper Wednesday, killing 12 people, including the paper’s editor and a cartoonist, before escaping in a getaway car.
The top threat is still Iran
By Linda Chavez- Posted on NYPost on Jan 4, 2015
The agreement last week between the governments of Iraq and Iran to enter a formal relationship to fight the Islamic State group should be deeply troubling to the United States.
The Islamic State, also known as ISIS, is a grave threat to the region and is responsible for the horrifying beheading of American journalists and an aid worker, as well as the brutal slaughter of countless innocent Muslims and Christians in Syria and Iraq.
But as grave a threat as the Islamic State is, Iran is a much greater threat — especially if it acquires nuclear weapons.
The brave face of opposition in Iran
By Soona Samsami- Posted on The Hill on Dec 3, 2014
In recent weeks, over two dozen women across Iran have been subjected to a spate of hideous acid attacks, leaving them with permanent burns on their faces and bodies. One victim reportedly died of her injuries in Isfahan after having acid splashed on her face by state-affiliated gangs. But far from being a mark of strength, these cowardly assaults on defenseless women expose the face of a weak and desperate theocracy unable to curb increasing social opposition to its rule - led by women.
Fighting the Islamic State Group Does Not Mean Allying with Iran
By Maryam Rajavi- Posted on USNews on Oct 28, 2014
As the gathering whirlwind of religious extremism masquerading as Islam leaves a trail of devastation in the Middle East and threatens large parts of the globe, a key question lingers about the role of Iran. Some observers – following the tired maxim that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" – argue that the threat of the Islamic State group transcends policy differences between Tehran and the West and should allow for collaboration against a common enemy. This view is naive and dangerous. In truth, Tehran and the Islamic State group complement and strengthen each other – ideologically as well as tactically on the field of battle.
Opinion
-
Ebrahim Raisi’s legacy of atrocity and repression
-
West must pay direct attention to Iran, not its proxies
-
To Stop Endless Wars, Iran Needs Regime Change
-
Time for Western Democracies to Stand with Iranian People
-
Iran’s Future, Democracy and Representative Government
-
Iran Targets Physicians, Nurses as Nascent Revolution Reaches Six-Month Mark
-
I am a former political prisoner in Iran. I worry the regime will execute female activists
-
Iran’s most powerful weapon isn’t working
-
Women rising up after decades of Iran regime’s oppression. They need the world’s support
-
Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visits the opposition and alternative to theocracy in Iran
IACNT on Social Networks
